Legal Opinion

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Clayton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 23, 1966No. 521PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaep, J.

Are poles rentals charged by a telephone company to electric power companies and other users of its poles includable in its franchise tax base? The answer to this question must be found in G.S. 105-120, the pertinent portions of which follow:

“Franchise or privilege tax on telephone companies. — (a) Every person, firm, or corporation, domestic or foreign, owning and/or operating a telephone business for the transmission of messages and/or conversations to, from, through, in or across this State, shall, within thirty days after the first day of January, April, July and October of each year,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Watson Industries, Inc. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Victory Cab Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Mullen v. Town of LouisburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Commonwealth v. Repplier Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Duke Power Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Lafayette Transportation Service, Inc. v. County of RobesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Broadwell Realty Corp. v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Intervenor Residents of Bent Creek/Mt. Carmel SubdivisionsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API