Legal Opinion
Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Clayton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided March 23, 1966No. 521PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShaep, J.
Are poles rentals charged by a telephone company to electric power companies and other users of its poles includable in its franchise tax base? The answer to this question must be found in G.S. 105-120, the pertinent portions of which follow:
“Franchise or privilege tax on telephone companies. — (a) Every person, firm, or corporation, domestic or foreign, owning and/or operating a telephone business for the transmission of messages and/or conversations to, from, through, in or across this State, shall, within thirty days after the first day of January, April, July and October of each year,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Watson Industries, Inc. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Victory Cab Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Mullen v. Town of LouisburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Commonwealth v. Repplier Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Duke Power Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Lafayette Transportation Service, Inc. v. County of RobesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Broadwell Realty Corp. v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Intervenor Residents of Bent Creek/Mt. Carmel SubdivisionsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.