Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Intervenor Residents of Bent Creek/Mt. Carmel Subdivisions
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 27, 1982No. 90PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEYER, Justice.
In its application filed with the Commission on 2 July 1979, the Company sought to increase its rates for water and sewer service for the Bent Creek and Mt. Carmel Acres subdivisions in Buncombe County. The Company proposed an annual increase in gross revenues of $34,370 based upon a test year ending 31 December 1978.
The Company’s income statement for the year ended 31 December 1978, filed as a part of its application, indicated an actual net operating loss of $31,652 which, after pro forma adjustments, decreased to a loss of $7,851. Under the requested increase of $34,370 the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Fuel Gas Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- Solar Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Conservation CouncilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. MacKieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. North Carolina Textile Manufacturers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.