Legal Opinion

Parker v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12340PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from an order granting the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The motion was made on the usual statutory grounds and was based on affidavits purporting to set forth newly discovered evidence. The order did not specify that the motion was granted on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.

The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as the result of a collision between the automobile in which she was riding as a guest and south-bound passenger train No. 84 of the defendant, known…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Griffin v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Parmenter v. McDougallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. New York Lubricating Oil Co. v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ineas v. Union Pac. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Pobor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Martindale v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Raliway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Tice v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Young v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1929

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API