Legal Opinion

New York Lubricating Oil Co. v. United Railroads of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1923No. S. F. No. 10274PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

The plaintiff in this action recovered judgment against the defendant for damages to its auto-truck resulting from a collision between the truck, operated by an agent of the .plaintiff, and a suburban electric car which was operated by the defendant upon a private right of way running parallel with Sloat Boulevard, in the city and county of San Francisco. The case was tried without a jury. The defense of the defendant rested in part upon the plea of contributory negligence. The trial court found, among other things, that the defendant was guilty of negligence which proximately contributed to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Dalley v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Bagwill v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Billig v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Parker v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Leblanc v. CoverdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API