Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Bartek
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 7, 2012No. 11-10594PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Plaintiff-Appellant, United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”), brought this action against Defendants-Appellees, Douglas J. Bartek (“Bartek”), and Nancy A. Richardson (“Richardson,” collectively the “Defendants”) for alleged violations of securities laws and regulations stemming from an options backdating scheme which occurred between 2000-2003. In addition to civil penalties, plaintiff also sought permanent injunctions and officer and director bars against the defendants. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted when the district…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- SEC v. Guy GentileCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. CollyardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Gross v. MaxDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. WylyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. JacksonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.