Legal Opinion
Gross v. Max
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided October 30, 2012No. 3:11-cv-463PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
PHILIP P. SIMON, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs Velma and Eugene Gross purchased a home from Defendants Richard and Delores Max in 2006, and three years later they discovered their daughter (Plaintiff Sierra Gross) had lead poisoning. On November 9, 2011, the Grosses filed this suit seeking recovery from the Maxes under the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act (“RLPHRA”). In an Opinion and Order dated August 2, 2012, 2012 WL 3284168, I dismissed this case on the grounds that it was barred by the statute of limitations.
The Grosses have moved for reconsideration of that…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mallak v. Aitkin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Rasmusson v. Chisago CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Kost v. HuntDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Potocnik v. CarlsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Kennedy v. City of BrahamDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.