Legal Opinion

Housing Authority v. Dorsey

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 18, 1973PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.

In this action for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, the plaintiffs, the Housing Authority of the city of New Haven, Polly Moorer and Joseph R. Peters, are seeking an adjudication as to whether Moorer and Peters, tenants of the housing authority, are each legally qualified to hold the position of housing commissioner of the plaintiff housing authority. The trial court found that the plaintiff tenants are not legally qualified to hold these positions and rendered a declaratory judgment to that effect, from which the plaintiffs have appealed to this court.

In the first two…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GraytonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Low v. Town of MadisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  3. State v. BensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  4. Stocker v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. State v. MurtesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Murach v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. State v. CobbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Brown v. KirkIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Sullivan AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Thompson v. OrcuttSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API