Legal Opinion

United States v. Wycliff

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 3, 1953No. 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BROSMán, Judge:

Accused stands convicted, following trial by general court-martial, of assault with intent to commit rape, and as well of sodomy, the former a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 134, 50 USC § 728, and the latter of Article 125, 50 USC § 719. Review by this Court was granted in response to a petition duly filed by the accused.

II

The single issue raised concerns the refusal of the law officer to instruct the members of the court-martial on the elements of the lesser offense of indecent assault, a crime proscribed by Article 134…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. ClarkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  2. United States v. HowardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. KeeveU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
  2. United States v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. WilsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. CaillouetteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API