United States v. Wilson
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
RAICHLE, Judge:
The accused, a clinical psychologist, was charged with one specification of forcible *681sodomy and three specifications of conduct unbecoming an officer and gentleman by committing forcible sodomy twice and indecent assault once, violations of Articles 125 and 133, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925, 933, Uniform Code of Military Justice (U.C.M.J.). In accordance with his pleas, he was convicted of all specifications, excepting the words “by force and without the consent of the said [X]” in the sodomy specifications. Both victims of these offenses were patients of the accused and the wives…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. MarkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. GiordanoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. BurdenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. SchreckU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. WycliffUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. WynnU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986