Legal Opinion

Barling v. Horn

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 10, 1956No. 45381PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OSDOL, Commissioner.

This is an action for specific performance of a clause in a lease whereby the lessees, plaintiffs, in the event the lessors desired to sell the leased premises prior to the expiration of the term, were to have the first opportunity to purchase the premises. The trial court denied specific performance on the ground that the lease stated no price or method for determining the price at which plaintiffs were to have the right to purchase, and, consequently, “the alleged option is indefinite and uncertain and unenforceable in equity.” Plaintiffs have appealed.

April 27,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brenner v. DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Kershner v. HurlburtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Beets v. TylerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. Fogg v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  5. Parker v. MurphySupreme Court of Virginia · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Atchison v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Unlimited Equipment Lines, Inc. v. Graphic Arts Centre, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Anderson v. Armour & CompanySupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Nelson v. ReisnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. King v. Dalton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API