Legal Opinion

Brenner v. Duncan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1947No. Docket No. 70, Calendar No. 43,616PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

In 1938 Burleigh. Bandall was the owner of a parcel of land 100 feet in width, the west 75 feet of which are the subject matter of this litigation. During the pendency of a suit which ultimately resulted in entry of a judgment against him for approximately $10,000 he conveyed the entire parcel to his stepson and wife, the defendants Duncan; they later conveyed to defendant Helen E. Kraker, who thereafter became Bandall’s wife. :The judgment creditors levied on the property qnd filed a creditors’ hill claiming that all of said conveyances, apparently made without consideration, were in fraud'…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parker v. MurphySupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
  2. Jurgensen v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. R. F. Robinson Co. v. DrewSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  4. Wilcox v. ClineMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Agar v. StreeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Guaclides v. KruseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Associated Truck Lines, Inc. v. BaerMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Gyurkey v. BablerIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Berry-Iverson Co. of North Dakota, Inc. v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Unlimited Equipment Lines, Inc. v. Graphic Arts Centre, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API