Brenner v. Duncan
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.
In 1938 Burleigh. Bandall was the owner of a parcel of land 100 feet in width, the west 75 feet of which are the subject matter of this litigation. During the pendency of a suit which ultimately resulted in entry of a judgment against him for approximately $10,000 he conveyed the entire parcel to his stepson and wife, the defendants Duncan; they later conveyed to defendant Helen E. Kraker, who thereafter became Bandall’s wife. :The judgment creditors levied on the property qnd filed a creditors’ hill claiming that all of said conveyances, apparently made without consideration, were in fraud'…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parker v. MurphySupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
- Jurgensen v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- R. F. Robinson Co. v. DrewSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
- Wilcox v. ClineMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Agar v. StreeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Guaclides v. KruseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Associated Truck Lines, Inc. v. BaerMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Gyurkey v. BablerIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Berry-Iverson Co. of North Dakota, Inc. v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Unlimited Equipment Lines, Inc. v. Graphic Arts Centre, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.