Legal Opinion

Beets v. Tyler

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 9, 1956No. 44890PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMAN, C..-[>79] In this action to try and determine the respective! rights, of.-plaintiffs and .defendant-, in regard to certain rqal estate-the plaintiffs sought, a decree to the .effect that they were, entitled to purchase; the said,real estate, in accordance with an option privilege hereinafter more fufly described, and a decree of specific performance to effectuate said- right.. Plaintiffs also,prayed that they ,be awarded as damages “the reasonable, monthly rental value pf said .prejnises, from. this date until the possession thereof is delivered to them.-’/ Plaintiffs, appeal from the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kershner v. HurlburtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Weber v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  3. Rice v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. P. R. T. Investment Corp. v. RanftSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Drake v. HicksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. ChumbleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Baier v. Darden RestaurantsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Ferrero Construction Co. v. Dennis Rourke Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Atchison v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  5. Hoag v. McBride & Son Inv. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API