Legal Opinion

J. C. Pirkle MacHinery Co. v. Lester

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 21, 1949No. 32427PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

1. The defendant’s first contention is that the general demurrer should have been sustained because the petition failed to allege facts from which it could be determined that any amount was owing by the defendant to the plaintiff, and failed to show any reason why such facts could not be alleged. In other words, the contention is that in the absence of any allegation as to expenses incurred in making the sale, the petition failed to set out a cause of action. We do not think this contention is meritorious. It may be that there were no expenses. The demurrer assumes that there necessarily were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Citizens & Southern Bank v. Union Warehouse & Compress Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Wometco Theatres Inc. v. United Artists Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Morgan v. LimbaughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. Yatesville Banking Co. v. Fourth National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Williams v. BernathCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barry v. Stanco Communications Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Theo v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Hughes v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Almon v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API