Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 4, 1964No. 40480PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Judge.

The redundant petition here sets forth a compromise agreement alleging duties arising under the agreement and its breach by the defendant. It is well settled by decisions of our appellate courts that compromise agreements are enforceable. Hale v. Lipham, 61 Ga. App. 191, 192, 193 (6 SE2d 115).

“ 'A cause of action is made up of two elements; namely, a duty and a breach of it’ (Bell v. Fitz, 84 Ga. App. 220, 223, 66 SE2d 108); and, 'Where a petition sets out a cause of action under any legal theory it is good as against general demurrer.’ Hall v. John Hancock Mutual Life…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bell v. FitzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Clarke County School District v. MaddenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Martin v. GurleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  4. Morgan v. LimbaughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  5. Medlock v. AycockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Willis v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Bishop v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. City of Atlanta v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. Wilson-Avery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Wren Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Midland-Guardian Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API