Theo v. National Union Fire Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carlisle, Judge.
The policy sued on covered all direct loss to the property caused by vandalism and malicious mischief and by collapse of the building or any part thereof. The allegations of the first count of the petition as amended were sufficient to show a valid and subsisting contract which created a duty on the part of the defendant to pay for any loss or damage occasioned by these causes, and alleged facts showing the occurrence of a loss with respect to the building located on Poole Creek Road covered by the policy sued on. As was said by Judge Parker in J. C. Pirkle &c. Co. v. Lester,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Southern Fire Insurance v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Harp v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Brooks v. RawlingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Marchant v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Turner v. WillinghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. DupreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. NeislerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Davis v. City of ForsythCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. N. A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bimco Iron & Metal Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.