Legal Opinion
Barry v. Stanco Communications Products, Inc.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 6, 1979No. 34265PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bowles, Justice.
This appeal is from an order of DeKalb Superior Court enjoining appellants from soliciting, selling, distributing, servicing or installing closed circuit television systems in any county of the State of Georgia, pursuant to the restrictions contained in an employment contract.
In May, 1977, the appellants H. B. Barry, Jr. and Irving Chess entered into an employment contract with Stanco Communications Products, Inc. under which they were given the right to solicit customers for Stanco in every county of Georgia. The contract contained a covenant not to compete, whereby Barry and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Howard Schultz & Associates of Southeast, Inc. v. BroniecSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Orkin Ex. Co. Inc., So. Georgia v. DewberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Thomas v. Coastal Industrial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Artistic Ornamental Iron Co. v. WilkesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Turner v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. MouyalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Hasty v. Rent-A-Driver, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Rollins Protective Services Co. v. PalermoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Reese M. Stidham, Iii, H. Paige Scarborough and John A. BrunerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Annis v. Tomberlin & Shelnutt Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.