Legal Opinion
Erickson v. Rubey
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 18, 2011No. 20100292PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Larry Rubey appeals from the district court order committing him as a sexually dangerous individual under N.D.C.C. ch. 25-03.3. Because there is clear and convincing evidence supporting the district court’s decision that Rubey is a sexually dangerous individual, is likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct, and has serious difficulty in controlling his behavior, we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In February 2010, the McLean County State’s Attorney petitioned the district court for the commitment of Rubey as a sexually dangerous individual under N.D.C.C. ch.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Cass County State's Attorney v. R.A.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Cass County State's Attorney v. E.W.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. LougheadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Molbert v. J.K.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Erickson v. RubeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Interest of CormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Reierson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Grosinger v. J.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Interest of TannerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.