Reierson v. Johnson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Jeremy Tim Johnson appeals a district court order committing him to the custody of the Department of Human Services as a sexually dangerous individual. Johnson argues the district court clearly erred by finding he has a congenital or acquired disorder manifested as a sexual disorder or dysfunction. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On January 13, 2012, the State petitioned for commitment of Johnson as a sexually dangerous individual under N.D.C.C. ch. 25-03.3. The State alleged Johnson, born in 1974, engaged in sexually predatory conduct based on four incidents. On August 25, 1998,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leno v. K & L Homes, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Spratt v. MDU Resources Group, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Erickson v. RubeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Grosinger v. J.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re HanenbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
3Cited by12 opinions
- Interest of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Interest of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. DockterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Interest of CormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Dubois v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.