Legal Opinion

Reierson v. Johnson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2013No. 20120364PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jeremy Tim Johnson appeals a district court order committing him to the custody of the Department of Human Services as a sexually dangerous individual. Johnson argues the district court clearly erred by finding he has a congenital or acquired disorder manifested as a sexual disorder or dysfunction. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On January 13, 2012, the State petitioned for commitment of Johnson as a sexually dangerous individual under N.D.C.C. ch. 25-03.3. The State alleged Johnson, born in 1974, engaged in sexually predatory conduct based on four incidents. On August 25, 1998,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leno v. K & L Homes, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Spratt v. MDU Resources Group, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Erickson v. RubeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Grosinger v. J.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. In Re HanenbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Interest of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Interest of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. DockterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Interest of CormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Dubois v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API