Legal Opinion

Hilton v. Mumaw

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 4, 1975No. Nos. 73-1077, 73-1131PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Anthony Hilton and Henry Hilton (Hiltons) brought this action against Henry and Bethel Mumaw (Mumaws),1 alleging claims of common law and equitable fraud and violations of Rev.Code Wash. § 21.20.010 and SEC Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. The alleged fraud was perpetrated in connection with contracts for the purchase of stock of Cohassett Beach Telephone Co. (Cohassett). Jurisdiction in the district court was founded upon diversity of citizenship.

After the Hiltons presented their casein-chief, the Mumaws moved for directed verdict. The district court granted the…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,366 Benjamin A. Cook v. Avien, Inc., James F. Pritchard, Benjamin A. Cook v. Avien, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  2. W. Kenneth Tregenza, James E. Haas, and Erwin B. Seegers v. Great American Communications Company and Shearson Lehman Brothers, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Burgess v. Premier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. General Signal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,722 Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Seaboard Corporation, Etc., Admiralty Fund and Admiralty Fund Growth Series Litigation Trust, Cross-Claimant/appellant v. Hugh Johnson & Company, Inc., Hugh Johnson, Norman Michael Keiser, and Ernst& Ernst, Cross-Defendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API