Legal Opinion

Haynie v. Veneman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 23, 2003No. CIV.A.00-2493 (PLF), CIV.A.00-2516 (PLF)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

These consolidated cases are before the Court on several motions: defendants’ motions to dismiss or, alternatively, to strike plaintiffs’ jury demands and prayers for interest in both cases, and plaintiffs motion for leave to amend her complaint in Civil Action No. 00-2493. In light of the divergence of procedural and substantive issues involved, the Court will address each case separately with respect to the pending motions. In this Opinion, the Court will consider only the motions pertaining to Civil Action No. 00-2493, the claims of plaintiff Belinda…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Adesalu v. CoppsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  2. Shea, William E. v. Rice, CondoleezzaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  3. Major v. Plumbers Local Union No. 5 of the United Ass'n of JourneymenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  4. Coghlan v. PetersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. Garcia v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API