Legal Opinion
RENT CONTROL BOARD OF CAMBRIDGE v. Praught
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided September 10, 1993No. 92-P-1421PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
Mary Fraught, a lawyer, resisted a subpoena du-ces tecum from the rent control board of Cambridge for the production of “[a]ny and all papers or other documents prepared or kept” by her or her law firm concerning the conveyance of a condominium unit at 42 Linnaean Street. The board brought an action in the Cambridge District Court to enforce the subpoena and a judge of that court ruled that Ms. Fraught was required “to comply with the subpoena.” From the judgment entered so ordering, Ms. Fraught has appealed. We affirm.
Among the substantive arguments that Ms. Fraught has raised are (1) the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Flynn v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- United States of America v. Daniel KlubockCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Apahouser Lock & Security Corp. v. CarvelliMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Risk Management Foundation of Harvard Medical Institutions, Inc. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. Commissioner of Department of Mental RetardationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- In re a Grand Jury SubpoenaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Town of Wellesley v. D&C Construction Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1998
- Brossard v. University of MassachusettsMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998
- Manchester v. Main Street Textiles, L.P.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007