Legal Opinion

In re a Grand Jury Subpoena

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 20, 2000PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

A single justice of this court has reserved and reported without decision the question whether we should create, on the basis of social policy considerations, a testimonial privilege for the parents of juveniles who have been subpoenaed to appear before a grand jury investigating the possible rape of another minor child by the juveniles.1 Because we conclude that the Legislature, in the first instance, is the more appropriate *591body to weigh the relative social policies and address whether and how such a privilege should be created; because the Legislature has not, to date, considered whether…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Commonwealth v. LicataMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Worthington v. ScribnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  5. People v. SandersIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re a Grand Jury SubpoenaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. In re Grand Jury InvestigationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Chadwick v. Duxbury Public SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  4. Adolescent & Family Institute of Colorado, Inc. v. Colorado Department of Human Services, Division of Behavioral HealthColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. COMMONWEALTH v. RAJIV R., a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API