In re a Grand Jury Subpoena
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
A single justice of this court has reserved and reported without decision the question whether we should create, on the basis of social policy considerations, a testimonial privilege for the parents of juveniles who have been subpoenaed to appear before a grand jury investigating the possible rape of another minor child by the juveniles.1 Because we conclude that the Legislature, in the first instance, is the more appropriate *591body to weigh the relative social policies and address whether and how such a privilege should be created; because the Legislature has not, to date, considered whether…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Commonwealth v. LicataMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Worthington v. ScribnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- People v. SandersIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re a Grand Jury SubpoenaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- In re Grand Jury InvestigationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Chadwick v. Duxbury Public SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Adolescent & Family Institute of Colorado, Inc. v. Colorado Department of Human Services, Division of Behavioral HealthColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- COMMONWEALTH v. RAJIV R., a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.