Legal Opinion

Brossard v. University of Massachusetts

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided September 29, 1998No. 961036Published

1Opinion of the CourtBotsford, J.

Introduction

The plaintiff Carlos Brossard brings this case under G.L.c. 66, §10, the Public Records Law (PRL), and G.L.c. 66A, the Fair Information Practices Act (FIPA)1 to gain access to certain documents in the custody of the defendant University of Massachusetts (the university). The university has moved for a ruling that the documents at issue are protected by the attorney-client and work product privilege2 and not subject to disclosure to Brossard either as “public records” (G.L.c. 4, §7, clause 26) or as “personal data” (G.L.c. 66A, §1).

Some background information is necessary. Until…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  4. Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. Commissioner of Department of Mental RetardationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Peters v. WallachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API