Legal Opinion
State v. Caudill
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 1976No. 75-1151PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStiulman, J.
The state of Ohio has appealed the decision of the Court of Appeals, assigning three errors listed *344as propositions of law. The first of these propositions recites:
“Where a defendant enters a written plea of no contest to a felony and, in writing, expressly acknowledges understanding all of his rights as enumerated in Criminal Rule 11(C), and expressly states his desire to waive said rights, and the trial court thereafter personally addresses the defendant concerning said written plea and waiver, and independently determines defendant understands the consequences thereof, there has been a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. BuchananOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. Harris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.