Legal Opinion

State v. Veney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 2008No. Nos. 2007-0656 and 2007-0657PublishedCited by 669 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

{¶ 1} Once again, we are asked to clarify the duties of the trial court in accepting pleas to felony charges and to determine the consequences of the trial court’s failure to comply with Crim.R. 11. The first issue is what level of compliance is required of the trial court when it advises a defendant of the state’s burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at trial before accepting a plea of guilty or no contest. The second issue is whether a failure to advise the defendant of this right is subject to harmless-error review under Crim.R. 52.1 We affirm the judgment of the court of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by669 opinions

  1. State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. BarkerOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. Miller (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Ohio v. VinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

664 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API