State v. Ballard
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
This cause presents a recurring question of what is required of a trial judge when accepting a guilty plea or a plea of no contest from a criminal defendant. Here, the appellant challenges the validity of his guilty plea because of the trial court’s alleged failure to inform him that by pleading guilty he was waiving his right to a trial by jury. Appellant, in effect, argues that the trial court did not comply in this regard with the mandate of either Crim. R. 11(C) or Boykin v. Alabama (1969), 395 U.S. 238.
Crim. R. 11 provides, in pertinent part:
“(C) Pleas of guilty and no contest in felony…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by610 opinions
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. GriggsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2006
605 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.