State v. Stewart
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCelebkezze, J.
The appellant’s sole proposition of law for this court’s consideration charges that a trial court, in accepting a guilty plea in a felony case must comply with Crim. R. 11. Appellant’s specific complaint alleges that the trial court failed to advise him that in pleading guilty to, murder (R. C. 29Ó3.Ó2),1 hé would not be eligible for probation.2
*88In the case of State v. Younger (1975), 46 Ohio App.2d 269, from the Court- of .Appeals for Cuyahoga .County, the court, in a well reasoned opinion, concluded with the-following: - - - ; ■
“Criminal Rule 11(C)(2). clearly and distinctly mandates that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. KrantzIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. StoneOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Douglas Fruchtman v. Frank Kenton, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Frank E. Bachner v. United States of America, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Frank E. BachnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by522 opinions
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court · 1978
517 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.