Legal Opinion

Adams v. City of Toledo

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1939PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

The amended complaint discloses that defendant City of Toledo is a duly incorporated city in Lincoln county, Oregon, maintaining a fire department and employing a fire chief; that plaintiffs are the owners of certain real property lying immediately west of and fronting upon Railroad street in said defendant city; that until the same was destroyed by the fire hereinafter mentioned, there was upon said parcel of real property a frame or wooden building used by plaintiffs for residential and commercial purposes.

The further pertinent allegations in plaintiffs’’ amended complaint are as follows:

“II…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Allas v. Borough of RumsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Giaconi v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Wilson v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Kobs v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Amphitheaters, Inc. v. Portland MeadowsOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Griffin v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Splinter v. City of NampaIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Borden v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API