Legal Opinion

Allas v. Borough of Rumson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 9, 1935PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The nonsuit was erroneous. The general rule is that one who sustains special damage from a common nuisance has an action therefor against the creator of the nuisance, although the latter may also be subject to indictment. But there is a firmly established exception to this rule, grounded in “ancient precedent and public policy,” that, in the absence of statutory provision to the contrary, a municipality is not liable to an individual for its failure to exercise an imperative governmental function, or for the negligence of its officers or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Kelley v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Bigelow v. Inhabitants of RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1860

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Hoggard v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  2. Kuzmiak v. BrookchesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Kress v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. Hartman v. City of BrigantineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Hammond v. County of MonmouthSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API