Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1994No. CC A8902-01014; CA A64191; SC S39510, S40017PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*503GILLETTE, J.

The issue in this case is whether the $100,000 liability limit in the pre-1989 version of the Oregon Tort Claims Act applies to attorney fees and costs awarded against a public body in an employment discrimination action that arose at the time that the limit was in effect. We hold that the limit applies.

Defendant Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (Tri-Met) is a municipal corporation that is subject to the Oregon Tort Claims Act (OTCA), ORS 30.260 to 30.300.1 Plaintiff was employed by Tri-Met as a bus driver and dispatcher from 1976 to 1989. In 1989,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Urban Renewal Agency v. LackeyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Vendrell v. School District No. 26COregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Antin v. Union High School District No. 2Oregon Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Joseph Midgett v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Hamlin v. HAMPTON LUMBER MILLS, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Abraham v. T. Henry Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Arnesano v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API