State v. Harris
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Justice.
Defendant appeals upon the assumption that his warrant-less arrest was without probable cause; that the accompanying search of his person was therefore illegal and the fruits of the search inadmissible in evidence against him. He concedes, ex necessitate, that if State’s Exhibits 1 and 2 were admissible the case was properly submitted to the jury. State v. Bell, 270 N.C. 25, 153 S.E. 2d 741.
“A police officer may search the person of one whom he has lawfully arrested as an incident of such arrest .... In the course of such search, the officer may lawfully take from the person…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- State v. BiberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.