Legal Opinion

Seaman v. Big Horn Canal Ass'n

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1923No. 1020PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Justice.

The action herein is one for an injunction brought in the District Court of Big Horn County, by G. Hartigan, as plaintiff, against the Big Horn Canal Association as defendant.

The defendant and appellant herein, is a corporation, organized in 1911 under the general incorporation laws of this state, for the purpose of owning and operating an irrigation system which supplies water, for irrigation, to land lying under its canal. The land is taken up and acquired under what is commonly known as the Carey Land Act, and the south one-half of Lot 69, T. 51 N. R. 93, in question here,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Wagner v. City of Rock IslandIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Omaha Water Co. v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. National Bank v. Watsontown BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. City of Chicago v. SextonIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  5. City of Montgomery v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Uhls v. State Ex Rel. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Chavez v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Griess v. Office of the Attorney General, Division of Criminal InvestigationWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. City of Beckley v. WolfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Wells v. Board of TrusteesWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API