Chavez v. City of Laramie
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE
The complaint of Tino Chavez and Theresa Chavez sets forth a claim for damages in connection with the construction of a new viaduct and highway approaches within the corporate limits of the City of Laramie, for relocation of a highway. The construction was being done under a cooperative agreement between the State of Wyoming and City of Laramie. The claim for damages is based upon the provisions of Art. 1, § 33, Wyoming Constitution, which guarantees:
“Private property shall not be taken or damaged for public or private use without just compensation.”
Specifically, the claimants allege that a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sanguinetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Koke Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Angelle v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Krause v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Anchorage v. ScaveniusAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Coronado Oil Co. v. GrievesWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Thacker v. Board of Trustees of Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Jivelekas v. City of WorlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.