Legal Opinion

Chavez v. City of Laramie

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1964No. 3185PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE

The complaint of Tino Chavez and Theresa Chavez sets forth a claim for damages in connection with the construction of a new viaduct and highway approaches within the corporate limits of the City of Laramie, for relocation of a highway. The construction was being done under a cooperative agreement between the State of Wyoming and City of Laramie. The claim for damages is based upon the provisions of Art. 1, § 33, Wyoming Constitution, which guarantees:

“Private property shall not be taken or damaged for public or private use without just compensation.”

Specifically, the claimants allege that a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sanguinetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Coca-Cola Co. v. Koke Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Angelle v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  4. Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Krause v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. City of Anchorage v. ScaveniusAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Coronado Oil Co. v. GrievesWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Thacker v. Board of Trustees of Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Jivelekas v. City of WorlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API