Legal Opinion

Uhls v. State Ex Rel. City of Cheyenne

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1967No. 3589PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE

This is an action to determine the validity of Cheyenne’s proposed financing of the $25,000,000 Frontier Refining Project and the constitutionality of the act for industrial development projects, art. 8, ch. 112, S.L. of Wyoming 1965 (§§ 15.1-92— 15.1-100, W.S.1957, Compiled 1965). To secure such determination, the state on the relation of the City of Cheyenne brought a mandamus action in the district court against the city clerk, seeking to compel execution of the Asset Purchase Agreement for acquisition of the Frontier Refining Project. In so doing, plaintiff sought a declaration of…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. State v. Town of North MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  3. Albritton v. City of WinonaMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  4. City of Gaylord v. Gaylord City ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Green v. City of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. North Carolina Industrial Development Financing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Clem v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Witzenburger v. State ex rel. Wyoming Community Development AuthorityWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State ex inf. Danforth v. State Environmental Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  5. In Re the Marriage of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API