Legal Opinion

Clipper Belt Lacer Co. v. E-W Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 14, 1916No. 2814PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan; Arthur J. Tuttle, Judge. " Suit in equity by the Clipper Belt Lacer Company against the E-W Company and others. Decree for defendants, and complainant appeals. The appellant brought suit below, alleging infringement of patent No. 806,556, dated December 5, 1905, issued to Mitchell and Gunn, for a belt stapling tool.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan; Arthur J. Tuttle, Judge. " Suit in equity by the Clipper Belt Lacer Company against the E-W Company and others. Decree for defendants, and complainant appeals. The appellant brought suit below, alleging infringement of patent No. 806,556, dated December 5, 1905, issued to Mitchell and Gunn, for a belt stapling tool. The first claim of the patent is: “A tool or appliance for the purposes referred to, comprising a bracket formed with a stepped portion integral with the bracket, and having a series of slits…

1Opinion of the CourtDenison, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The patented device is very simple. If only one staple is considered the device is seen to be a mere driving guide of suitable shape, and its *604patentability would be, at least, doubtful; but the invention consists in providing a series of these, side by side, so that several staples can be driven at once and will be held and driven in that precise position necessary to bring all the extended loops in lateral alignment so that when the two. belt ends are united and a pivot pin inserted, every loop will bear on the pin. This might have been done by inserting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Tube Co. v. MarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  2. Schiebel Toy & Novelty Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  3. Frey v. Marvel Auto Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  4. J. F. Rowley Co. v. Columbus Pharmacal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  5. Thacher v. Transit Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farrington v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  2. Jones v. General Fireproofing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  3. Metropolitan Device Corp. v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  4. Clipper Belt Lacer Co. v. Detroit Belt Lacer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Enterprise Railway Equipment Co. v. Pullman Standard Car Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API