Legal Opinion

Enterprise Railway Equipment Co. v. Pullman Standard Car Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 26, 1938No. 6422PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff questions the propriety of a decree of the District Court finding invalid claims 10 and 13 of patent No. 1,537,050, and claim 9 of patent No. 1,537,051, both granted on May 5, 1925.1 Each relates to improvements in railway car construction.

*19Campbell, the patentee, after some six earlier attempts along the same line, applied for and obtained the patents; the claims thereof, with which we are concerned, being substantially the same. In patent No. 1,537,050 he carried forward his efforts to build a useful hopper car of maximum capacity within the dimensional…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Railroad Supply Co. v. Elyria Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Frederick R. Stearns & Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  4. Torrey v. HancockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. Parks & Bohne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  2. George M. Mooney v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Howe v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
  4. Mooney v. Brunswick Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1980
  5. Components, Inc. v. Western Electric Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API