Enterprise Railway Equipment Co. v. Pullman Standard Car Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff questions the propriety of a decree of the District Court finding invalid claims 10 and 13 of patent No. 1,537,050, and claim 9 of patent No. 1,537,051, both granted on May 5, 1925.1 Each relates to improvements in railway car construction.
*19Campbell, the patentee, after some six earlier attempts along the same line, applied for and obtained the patents; the claims thereof, with which we are concerned, being substantially the same. In patent No. 1,537,050 he carried forward his efforts to build a useful hopper car of maximum capacity within the dimensional…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Railroad Supply Co. v. Elyria Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Frederick R. Stearns & Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Torrey v. HancockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Ford Motor Co. v. Parks & Bohne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- George M. Mooney v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Howe v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
- Mooney v. Brunswick Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1980
- Components, Inc. v. Western Electric Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.