Legal Opinion
Farrington v. Haywood
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1929No. 5224PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
This is an action for infringement of patent No. 1,336,830, granted to Charles F. Farrington, April 13, 1920, for a barrel agitator. Claims 1, 4, 6, 11, 15, 16, and 17 are in issue. The invention consists of a stirrer or agitator especially adapted for use in stirring paint shipped in metal barrels or drums having a centrally disposed bunghole in one of the heads through which the stirrer may be inserted. The form shown in the drawings and described in the specification consists of a single piece of fiat metal, pivoted to the head opposite the bunghole, thence…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Burr v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- J. L. Owens Co. v. Twin City Separator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Great Lakes Equipment Company v. Fluid Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- McKays Co. v. Penn Electric Switch Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Highway Appliances Co. v. American Concrete Expansion Joint Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Metropolitan Device Corp. v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- Bettendorf Co. v. Ohio Steel Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.