Schiebel Toy & Novelty Co. v. Clark
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio; Howard C. Hollister, Judge. Three suits in equity by the Schiebel Toy & Novelty Company against David P. Clark. Decrees for defendant, and complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
WARRINGTON, Circuit Judge.
These three suits were for alleged infringements of particular letters patent, and, in addition to the usual features of such cases, issues growing out of the dissolution of a copartnership and sale of its assets, also concerning alleged unfair competition, were involved. As far as necessary, these issues will he noticed as we progress. The patents in suit relate to improvements in toys of the type known as locomotive toys.
The first suit involved letters patent No. 676,420, dated June 18, 1901, and issued to the appellee, Clark. The patent covers a friction-driven…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- D'Arcy Spring Co. v. Marshall Ventilated Mattress Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Gordon Form Lathe Co. v. Walcott MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- Freeman v. AltvaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.