Legal Opinion
Kumle v. Grand Lodge Ancient Order of United Workmen
California Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1895No. 18457PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yuba County and from an order denying a new trial. E. A. Davis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and from an order denying defendant's motion for a new trial.
The action is brought by Julia E. Kumle to recover two thousand dollars as the beneficiary named in a certain beneficiary certificate issued by the defendant corporation to Peter Kumle, on the fourteenth day of November, 1870, in the words and figures following:
“ Grand Lodge, Ancient Order of United Workmen of
California.
“No. 8,007. $2,000.
“ This certificate, issued by the authority of the Supreme Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen, witnesseth:
“ That brother Peter…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Piedmont, Etc. Life-Ins. Co. v. Ewing, Etc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor of the World v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Mulroy v. Supreme Lodge of the Knights of HonorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
- Dawson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Tobin v. Western Mutual Aid SocietySupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ball v. GussenhovenMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- De Molera v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Cain v. Gold Mountain Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
- Kinney v. Brotherhood of American YeomenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Haight v. TryonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.