Nichols v. Randall
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
The amended complaint alleges that on April 1, 1883, the plaintiff deposited with defendant $35,000 to be loaned by defendant for plaintiff, and that defendant guaranteed plaintiff nine per cent per annum interest upon said money, compounded annually.
That defendant did not loan said money, but used the same in his own business.
That in April, 1897, the defendant repudiated his trust in regard to said moneys, refused to account to plaintiff therefor, and ever since has refused to pay plaintiff the said sum or any part thereof. Judgment is prayed for said $35,000 and $20,000 interest…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Minor v. BaldridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Shain v. SresovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Mondran v. GouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Bryan v. TormeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fontana Land Co. v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Brown v. Crown Gold Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Sublett v. Henry's Turk & Taylor LunchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Goldtree v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Wright v. Bankers Service CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.