Legal Opinion

Sublett v. Henry's Turk & Taylor Lunch

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1942No. S. F. 16766PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

— This is an action by an employee to recover that portion of the compensation paid him by the defendant employer which he was compelled to return immediately to the employer under a so-called “kick-back” scheme. The plaintiff, Raymond Sublett, was a member of the Waiters’ and Dairy Lunehmen’s Union, Local 30, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor. The trial court found that on or about the first day of February, 1936, the defendants contracted and agreed with Local Number 30 to pay the union scale of wages, and that this contract was in full force and effect during the period…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cooke v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Holzer v. ReadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Wright v. RoseberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Alvord v. Spring Valley Gold Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Haese v. HeitzegCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Chavez v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Kerr's Catering Service v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Jefferson County School District No. R-1 v. ShoreySupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. Cione v. Foresters Equity Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API