Legal Opinion

People v. Brattingham

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1928No. Docket No. 1584PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion of the defendant for modification of the judgment heretofore made and entered. The judgment in question is one after verdict of guilty of the charge contained in the information accusing the defendant of a violation of section 141 of the California Motor Vehicle Act (Stats. 1923, p. 562). The judgment was:

“ ... It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the said Alfred J. Brattingham be punished by imprisonment in the county jail of the county of Los Angeles for the term of one year; in addition, defendant shall pay a fine of $1000.00;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. FlohrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. People v. CarkeekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. People v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. People v. ZolotoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API