Legal Opinion

People v. Ramirez

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1934No. Crim. No. 261PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

In an information filed on July 10, 1930, the defendant was charged with the crime of burglary. After a plea of guilty judgment was pronounced and he was ordered confined in a state penitentiary. On October 28', 1933, he filed a motion to vacate the judgment on the ground that the same was void and that the court had no jurisdiction to make and enter the same for the reason that the trial court, without any evidence before it to show the degree thereof, fixed the crime as burglary in the first degree. From an order denying this motion, this appeal is taken.

The sole contention here made is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. ParaskevopolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. People v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. StrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. People v. BrattinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. DenneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. FlohrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. People v. ZolotoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API