Legal Opinion

People v. Carkeek

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1939No. Crim. 1695PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a final judgment of conviction of .the crime of burglary in the second degree which carried with it an adjudication that appellant was an habitual criminal under the provisions of section 644 of the Penal Code. The appeal is prosecuted under section 1237, subdivision 3, of the Penal Code, which provides that the defendant may appeal “from any order made after judgment affecting the substantial rights of the party”.

An information was filed against appellant, as follows:

“The District Attorney of the County of Tuolumne, State of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. People v. SchwarzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. DunlopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. People v. MacKabeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. State v. MeadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  5. People v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API