Legal Opinion

People v. Diamond

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 1970No. Crim. 3934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COUGHLIN, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions of the offenses of selling the dangerous drug “LSD” on two occasions, i.e., violations of Health and Safety Code section 11912.

On the first occasion, the subject of the sale, described by defendant as “heavy acid,” consisted of 19 blue tablets, and on the second occasion consisted of 100 blue tablets. A chemist who analyzed two tablets from the first sale and three tablets from the second sale, determined each tablet contained 200 micrograms of LSD.

Defendant contends under the decision in People v. Leal, 64 Cal.2d 504 [50 Cal.Rptr. 777, 413…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. LealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Bone v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Decter v. Stevenson Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Dankert v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. LoveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. People v. BreckenridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. People v. GoodspeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API