Legal Opinion
People v. Love
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 15, 1977No. Crim. 16381PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.*
Appellant, Emmett Love, Jr.; and codefendant Paul A. Fulmer, after a jury trial, were convicted of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) with an allegation of use of a firearm by each (Pen. Code, § 12022.5). Appellant’s motion for new trial was denied, but the use clause was stricken as to him.1
On November 21, 1975, Richard Roster was working as the only attendant at a gas station in Berkeley. A man came to the station office purportedly seeking change, pointed a gun at Roster’s chest, and demanded all of the money in the station. Roster gave the robber the money and then, at his…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- People v. SpriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. BelmontesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. DeJesusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Vorse v. SarasyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. ShoemakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.