Legal Opinion
Thomas v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 9, 1994No. 91-CF-113, 91-CF-818PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING EN BANC
KING, Associate Judge:
On December 30, 1992, two divisions of this court, in unrelated cases, affirmed the convictions of Sean A. Thomas and Alonzo D. Washington for controlled substance violations, rejecting claims that the evidence presented did not constitute a “usable amount” of the controlled substance in question. Thomas v. United States, 619 A.2d 20 (D.C.1992), and Washington v. United States, 619 A.2d 30 (D.C.1992) (per curiam). In Thomas, Judge Sullivan, in a separate opinion, suggested that the en bane court address the question of whether this court should…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Palmore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. LealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- McIntosh v. WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. MorenoArizona Supreme Court · 1962
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Otts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Duvall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. GroceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- Turner v. BaylyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.