Legal Opinion
Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Superior Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 22, 1964No. 18998_1PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is from a final judgment in. a patent infringement action. 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a) and (b). Jurisdiction here-rests upon 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Two patents are involved, United States Patent No. 2,896,938 and No. 2,912,235 (hereinafter referred to as the ’938 patent and the ’235 patent, respectively).
Appellant sued for contributory infringement and active inducement to infringe ’938 and Claim 14 of ’235. Appellee denied infringement, and validity of the patents, and counter-complained for unfair competition and harassment. By pre-trial order, only Claims 2, 3 and 4 of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- John W. Bentley v. Sunset House Distributing Corp., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Maurice A. Garbell, Inc. v. Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1973
- Mayview Corp. v. RodsteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- St. Regis Paper Company v. Royal Industries, and Plas-Ties Subsidiary, St. Regis Paper Company v. Royal Industries, and Plas-Ties SubsidiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Ritter v. Rohm & Haas CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.