Legal Opinion
Maurice A. Garbell, Inc. v. Boeing Company
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 1, 1973No. Civ. A. 63-658-AAH, 63-659-AAHPublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION, FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT
HAUK, District Judge.
PRELIMINARY FINDINGS AND MEMORANDUM DECISION
On June 6, 1963, some two and one-half years after Dr. Garbell became convinced that the Boeing 707 and the Douglas DC-8, on each of which he had taken one flight as a passenger, must incorporate his wing design since each exhibited such excellent flying qualities, the Garbell plaintiffs filed these actions against the defendants Boeing and Douglas.
The cases were assigned to Judge Peirson Hall who, on his own motion, dismissed each with prejudice.…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. Joseph J. Biafore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Maurice A. Garbell, Inc. v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Farmer Brothers Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1974
- National Semiconductor Corp. v. Linear Technology Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1988
- Blaw-Knox Co. v. Barber-Greene CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.