Legal Opinion
Wallace v. Miller
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 19, 1938No. Civ. 1866PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an action to recover damages to property and for personal injuries resulting from a collision of two automobiles on a public highway of Tulare County on January 24, 1936. The jury awarded plaintiff damages in the sum of $120.25. He moved for a new trial. His motion was granted and a new trial ordered on the question of damages only. Defendant has appealed from this order.
The only question presented on this appeal is whether or not the trial judge abused his discretion in granting a new trial on the question of damages alone instead of granting a new trial generally.
It is admitted that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Pearl v. PearlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Donnatin v. Union Hardware & Metal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Murray v. KrenzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Clifford v. RuoccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- McNear v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.